Cathode ray tube structure and process



1960 G. A. BURDICK ETAL 2,936,683

CATHODE RAY TUBE STRUCTURE AND PROCESS 8 Sheets-Sheet 1 Filed July 2, 1956 ATTORNEY y 17, 1960 G. A. BURDICK an. 2,936,683

CATHODE RAY TUBE STRUCTURE AND PROCESS 8 Sheets-Sheet I Filed July 2, 1956 E & WIIIIUIFIA WWW/1M2 FIG.6.

n T K N mm w W F a n A .LEY GGB FIG- 7.

May 17, 1960 Filed July 2. 1956 G. A. BURDICK ETAL CATHODE RAY TUBE STRUCTURE AND PROCESS 8 Sheets-Sheet 3 MISREGISTRY INVENTORS GLEN A. BURDICK GEO$GE R. KAUTZ 9;

TI'ORNEY y 1960 G. A. BURDICK an. 2,936,683

CATHODE RAY TUBE STRUCTURE AND PROCESS 8 Sheets-$heet 4 Filed July 2, 1956 MlSREC-ASTRY FIELD BEAM FORCE FIGJB.

M a U 0 $3 n Am 0 r LOv-M ILEB GG May 17, 1960 G. A. BURDICK ETAL 2,936,683

CATHODE RAY TUBE STRUCTURE AND PROCESS 8 Sheets-Sheet 5 Filed July 2, 1956 PmmuuO GUN AX\S FIG. \6.

m z Y OKT. E TCU N mm m w Q A A 0/ R mm G6 May 17, 1960 s. A. BURDICK ETAL 2,936,583

CATHODE RAY TUBE STRUCTURE AND PROCESS 8 Sheets-Sheet 6 Filed July 2, 1956 1 Z m n Tm N E m U w flm A May 17, 1960 G. A. BURDICK :nu. 2,936,683

CATHODE RAY TUBE STRUCTURE AND PROCESS 8 Sheets-Sheet 7 Filed July 2. 1956 INVENTORS GLEN A. BURDlCK 6458565 R KAUTZ Wm May 17, 1960 G. A. BURDICK ETAL CATHODE RAY TUBE STRUCTURE AND PROCESS Filed July 2. 1956 8 Sheets-Sheet 8 LENS AX\S TUBE AXE:

BEAM

LIGHT AXIS LENS AXiS INVENTORS GLEN A.BURDICK GEORGE R. KAUTZ ATTORNEY United States Patent CATHODE RAY TUBE STRUCTURE AND PROCESS Glen A. Burdick, Waterloo, and George R. Kautz, Seneca Falls, N. assignors, by mesne assignments, to Sylvania Electric Products Inc., Wilmington, Del., a corporation of Delaware Application July 2, 1956, Serial No. 595,451

'4 Claims. (Cl. 95-1) This invention relates to image reproduction devices and more particularly to cathode ray tube structures adapted to be used in color television receiving appara-' tus, and to the method of making such devices.

Picture tubes employed as image reproduction devices in color television receivers generally have one or more electron guns for providing a source and the acceleration, focusing and modulation voltages for the electron beam or beams employed in the device. When more than one electron gun is utilized, convergence electrodes or pole pieces are generally also fabricated as part of the electron gun structure. These modulated electron beams are deflected across the screen to provide electron impingement upon selected ones of color fluorescing material configurations formed on the viewing panel of the tube to reproduce the transmitted color image. Conventionally, a grid or series of grids or a mask are interposed between the electron gun or guns and picture tube screen to provide deflection or focusing of the electron beam or masking of the screen. r

The screen for a color picture tube is generally made with a very large number of dot, bar or stripe formations consisting of red, green and blue color fluorescent materials. The configuration of the fluorescent patterns constituting the screen are formed in accordance with the number of electron guns employed and with the configuration and operative characteristics of the grids or masks used in the picture tube.

Since a very large number of fluorescent material groups are needed to produce a pattern suflicient to provide a high resolution picture, the process of forming the fluorescent pattern must be one which is capable of accurately forming discrete configurations if color purity is to be realized. One preferred process utilizes a printing technique wherein the viewing panel, which has been coated with a light sensitive substance and the desired fluorescent material, is exposed to a point source of light through an appropriate negative master. The screen is subsequently developed to produce the first fluorescent pattern comprising, for instance, an array of blue fluorescent material configurations. This process is sequentially repeated with green and red fluorescent materials to complete the production of the tri-color screen. The point source of light is appropriately offset during the exposure operation to provide individual color emitting fluorescent material patterns which are displaced from one another to form a screen prescribed by the type of picture tube in which it is employed.

- Although the photo-printing technique used in the art of producing the viewing screens for color picture tubes has enhanced the feasability of large scale production of these tubes, there is still much to be desired in the actual image reproduction characteristics of the tubes so produced. One difliculty encountered lies in the manufacturing inability to maintain the extremely rigid and narrow tolerances of the parts and assemblies dictated by the image reproduction device system within the tube itself. A second difficulty, and one of primary importance, is

a ing in and around the tube.

2,936,683 Patented May 17, 1960 based upon the fact that electrons do not follow the same path during tube operation as the light rays travel during the screen processing procedures. Consequently, the electrons do not properly land on the fluorescent material configurations during tube operation, and an image having color impurity results. This occurrence is normally referred to by the term misregistry.

The various contributing factors of misregistry recited above are inherent in any type of picture tube utilizing one or more electron beams to reproduce a hifidelity multicolor picture. For instance, due to the fact that many parts having different shapes and compositions must be assembled together and processed separately and in combination, sometimes at very high temperatures, actual physical deformations and misalignment of the parts will inherently occur. In addition, due to the charge and mass of the electrons projected towards the screen of the tube, the paths of travel of the electrons are altered by the tube geometry and, in some instances, by various electrostatic and magnetic symmetrical and unsymmetrical fields exist- For example, it has been discovered that the center of deflection (i.e., the location within the deflection yoke where the scanned electrons appear to come from) move as the electron beam is caused to scan the screen. Also, extraneous electron affecting fields such as the earths magnetic field alters the paths of electron movement. When more than one gun is used, an additional phenomena resulting from dynamic convergence of the electron beams causes a departure of the beams from their otherwise expected paths of travel.

Numerous methods for reducing the amount of misregistry between the electron beam or beams and the fluorescent configurations have been proposed. For the most part, these methods include the use of auxiliary electrostatic or magnetic field producing devices employed internally or externally of the tube and on or about the tube parts to compensate for the excursion of the electron beam from the desired trajectory. In instances where a certain type of misregistry has been attributed to a specific phenomena, one or more of the tube components and its associated electron affecting devices have been physically positioned to have the beam follow a path which will produce a mean value of misregistry over the entire screen. This procedure, is at best, a compromise, and does not-provide the solution for the problem of misregistry.

Accordingly, it is an object of the invention to reduce the aforementioned difliculties and to provide an improved image reproduction device.

A further object is the provision of improved screens for image reproduction devices.

Another object is the provision of a method of produc ing improved image reproduction device screens.

A still further object is to provide an optical system and exposure device for producing improved screens.

Another object is the provision of a method and a device for reducing misregistry between electron beams and fluorescent material screen configurations arising from the tube geometry and structure, and such variances in electron travel from expected trajectory as are due to the apparent center of deflection movement, the earths field, electrostatic and magnetic fields, and in some tubes, convergence action of the electron beams.

The foregoing objects are achieved in one aspect of the invention, by the provision of a printing method using afrefractive or reflective medium which causes the radiant energy or light rays used in the printing operation to be directed toward the panel in such a manner that an image reproduction device screen will be formed with a pattern corrected in accordance with the above described factors eflecting misregistry. This retracting medium is used in conjunction with a predetermined positioning of four of the many types oficathode ray tubesjwhichmay embody one or more of the aspects of the invention;

Fig. 6 is a series of cross sectionalviews of the face panel of a cathode ray tube showing the steps embodied in the method of forming a cathode ray tube screen;

Fig. 7 is an illustration of an apparatus used for the production of screens for cathode ray tubes;

Fig. 8 is a diagram illustratingnthe motion of the apparent center of deflection ofan. electron stream in a typical cathode ray tube;

Fig. 9 illustrates one type of misregistry resulting from the motion of the apparent center of 'deflectionas shown in Fig. 8;

Fig. 10 illustrates alight optical system formed to provide light ray travel in accordance with the electron travel in a tube of the type illustrated in Fig. 9;

Fig. 11 shows the effects of the earths magnetic field on the electron beams employed in a picture tube;

Fig. 12 is a diagram illustrating the type of misregistry. caused by the earths field;

Fig. 13 is a vector diagram illustrating the manner-in. which the vertical component of the earths magneticfield.

operates on an electron beam;

Fig. 14 shows the locus ofIthe apparent movement of the center of deflection of'beams actingunder the in-. fluence of the earths field;

Fig. 15 shows an optical system for matching the light optics. utilized in the screen forming process with the.

electron trajectory shown in Fig.v 14;

Fig. 16 illustrates a variation of the position of the light source relative to the lens from that illustrated in.

Fig. 15;

Fig. 17 illustrates severalelectron beam paths with-- out dynamic convergence;

Fig. 18 illustrates the electron beam pathswith dynamic convergence and the resulting misregistry;

Fig. 19 shows the resultant direction ofthe locusof.

beam deflection with dynamic convergence;

Fig. 20 shows the. locus of the apparent center of. de-

flee-tion applied.to the picture tube when considering bothdynamic convergence and center of deflection motion;

Fig. 21 is an optical system for matching the light optics with the electron positions shown in .Fig. 20; and

Fig. 22 is an optical system using several of the embodiments illustrated in previous drawings.

Referring to Fig. 1, there is shown a typical image:

provide the source of and acceleration, modulation. and.

focusing for. the beam or'beams 23 utilized in .the tube.-

A screen 25 comprisingthe. usual configurations'of elec--' tronresponsive fluorescent materials is formed onthe internal surface of panel 17'. Positioned adjacent screen" 25 is a mask or grid 27. The type of tubeillustratedin Fig; 1 may use the grid 27 primarily to either'focus or deflect beam 23-or, to mask or mask'and focus the beam to attain proper fluorescent excitation. To provide' the rasterv for the screen, a pair of horizontal and;

vertical deflection coils 29' are mounted upon neckpon tion 13 adjacent the small diametenof funnel 15;. Thesecoils, upon proper energization by the deflection circuitry;

4 employed in the receiver, cause the beam or beams to be deflected in a manner well understood in the art.

Figs. 2 through 5 inclusive show diagrammatically four examples of the many types of tubes adapted to utilize one or more of the embodiments forming part of the invention. Fig. 2 illustrates a tri-gun shadow mask tube employing a large number of triads of blue, green and redicolor emitting phosphordots arranged on the screen. The guns or emitters 31 are spaced equidistant from one another and. are mechanically mounted for static convergence at the mask or grid along the axis of the tube. The electron guns 31 each emit a stream ofelectrons 33 which converge at an aperture 35 in mask 37, and cross one another to impingeupon the associated phosphor dot 39 formed on'panel 41. Generally, the final anode of guns 31 are maintained at the same potential as the mask 37 and screen 41 so that the electrons are traveling in a field-free space intermediate the gun and screen. However, .a potential smaller in magnitude than the screen potential may be applied to the mask so that an electrostaticelectron lens will be formed in each aperture to provide focusing action for each beam.

Fig.3 illustrates -a tri-gun post acceleration type tube utilizing groups. ofvertically disposed phosphor stripes, each group. consisting of one stripe each of the red, green and .blue color emitting phosphor materials. The electron emitters .43. are laterally aligned relative to one another so. that the individual electron .beams will statically convergealong the plane of g rid.47 and between pre-selected pairs ofgrid wirestocross oneanother and impinge upon the associated phosphorv stripes 49 formed on.pane1,51.

During operation of the tube, ,a lower potential is appliedv to grid 1 47 than the screen 49 so that anelectrostatic electron. focusinglens is. formed between each pair of tron emitter. 53.- directs an electronstream 55 between the. deflecting. grids. 57- and 59, which. are electrically isolated from .oneanother, to cause impingement thereof upon .the-proper one-of .the phosphor stripes lformed on..panel .63.- The electrons are deflected in accordance w1th.the.potentials;.on the gridvwires at a given instant.

It hasbeenproposed that a tube construction of this type. couldemploy, vertically disposed grids and stripes with some modifications.

Fig. 5 illustrates a single gun type color picture tube using. groupsof vertical stripes formed from red, green and .bluecolor emitting phosphor materials. The electron emitter 65 is caused to emit an electron stream which impinges upon the phosphor, stripes 69 deposited on panel.

71. Boththe luminence and thechroma portions of the color'signal aretapplied'to' theelectron gun electrodes to" causetmodulation of the electron stream as it is moved.

horizontally across the screen. Generally, indexing lines are used in conjunction with the screen of'this'type so' thataccurate-determination of 'th'eb'eam position can be relaycdi to the receiver circuitry:

A single" gun, horizontal stripe type COlOltllb6j of 'the general character described .above utilizes spot wobble to' affect similar results. In this instance, the horizontal scanning movement is changed. from a substantially linear direction to oneLhaVinga substantially, saw-toothedform.

The horizontal. .scan line. therefor comprises. a plurality of. serially arrayedv saw-toothed .waves each. of; which trans l E i l verses a group of-red, green and blue'color emitting phosphor stripes. 1

Still another type of tube such as the flat electron discharge type has been proposed. Essentially, this tube is a modification of one or more-of the tubes described above, with the primary deviation residing in the position of the electron gun relative to the screen. Generally, the gun is mounted either above,below or 'atthe side of the screen. The electrons are projected initially in a direction having a component away from thescreen, and the beam or beams are subsequently deflected to cause them to assume a path which is directed towards the screen. g

Still another type of color tube employs a hollow tubular electron beam which is modulated to control the inside diameter of the beam. A screen having a'large number of groups of red, green'and blue color emitting phosphor materials comprising separate concentric circles each having a finite thickness is used in conjunction with this beam. Color images are reproduced by impingement of the tubular beam on one of the phosphor circles in each group.

Although a number of different types of color picture tubes have been described, it is to be understood that certain or all of the aspects described in the several recited embodiments of the invention are equally applicable to other types of image reproduction device structures and systems in addition to the types exemplified herein.

As previously stated, the process of forming the phosphor screen employed in the tube utilizes a photographic printing technique. Fig. 6 shows the essential steps included in this operation, which is begun by coating the internal surface of a glass face panel 73 with a radiant energy sensitive substance 75, such as the light sensitive material, polyvinyl alcohol sensitized with ammonium dichromate. This coating may be applied by flowing, spraying, or other similar fluid depositing methods. A fluorescent material 77 such as the red phosphor, zinc phosphate, is next applied to substance 75 in any convenient manner such as by spraying or dusting. If desired, the radiant energy sensitive substance 75 and phos phor material 77 may be intermixed initially to form a slurry which may be subsequently deposited on panel 73. Preselected areas of the layer comprising substance 75 and phosphor material 77 are then exposed to a radiant energy source such as a point source of light through an appropriate mask or negative master. The exposed areas become hardened and adhere to panel 73. The pattern so produced is next developed by the application of a developing fluid such as deionized water to the panel to remove the unhardened areas and to produce a series of bars, stripes, or dots consisting of the red color emitting phosphor material 77 and its associated hardened subtance 75.

The aforementioned operation is repeated using blue and green color emitting phosphor materials, with appro priate off-setting of the light source during each exposure operation to produce the complete viewing screen shown in Fig. 6. The green phosphor material, zinc orthosilicate, and the blue phosphor material, zinc sulfide, are indicated in the drawing by the numerals 76 and 78respectively. Two examples of a phosphor screen made by this process are adapted to be employed in a color 'pic ture tube are illustrated by the tri-dot pattern in Fig. 2 and the stripe patterns of Figs. 3, 4 and 5.

The exposure operation utilized in the screen forming process uses a lighthouse apparatus such as the one shown in Fig. 7. After the glasspanel 73 has been coated with the radiant energy sensitive substance 75 and the desired fluorescent material 77, it is placed upon frame 79 and aligned therewith radially and axially by means of the cooperation between bumps 80 formed on the bottom surface of panel rim 81 and grooves formed on the top surface of frame 79. Inside the frame is a light rod or transmitter 83 which collectslight from the cylindrical lamp. The rod is diffusely ground and performs as a point source radiating light-toward the panel. Mounted above light rod 83 is a light refractive medium or lens 87 which refracts the light rays to provide certain corrections for the positions of'the screen material configurationsas will be hereinafter described. The light source 83 and lens 87 are offset at a pre-determined distance from the axis 88 of panel 73 for each of the three separate color pattern configuration forming processes. A negative master 89, such as a grid or aperture mask, is positioned intermediate the light source 83 and face panel 73 to provide proper masking of the screen material so that only the desired areas of the screen will be exposed for any given pattern forming operation. In a conventional shadow mask tube, the distance from the tip of light rod 83 to-the center of lens 87 may be approximately 1% inches, the distance from lens 87 to grid 89 may be approximately 13.7 inches, and the grid to screen distance may be approximately .6 inch. However, assuming a lens system having the proper optical aberration, it can be seen that the diameter of the lens will determine the light rod to lens dimension and the lens to grid dimension. Preferably, the distance between lens 87 and grid 89 will be larger than between the lens and the light rod in order to minimize lens fabrication problems and cost and to enhance efficiency of the exposure device and process.

Some color tube screen processes utilize one negative master mask or grid to form all of the screens made by the screen photo-printing operation. In other processes, the mask on grid-itself serves as" the negative in the screen printing process performed on the particular viewing panel with which it will be later employed in the finished tube. Inthefirst instance, the master may incorporate a complex pattern, which, when pro jected upon the screen panel by a simple point source of light will yield the desired fluorescent configuration. Al ternately, a' more simple master pattern may be used in conjunction with a more complex optical system to yield the desired fluorescent configuration. In thesecond instance, while the mask or grid pattern may be simple or complex, an optical system in which the termination of the light paths correspond with the termination of the electron paths in the operating tube is a necessity. In either instance, it is manifestly important that all masters, masks, grids and optical systems employed be made with a very high degree of accuracy and in accordance with a form necessitated by the tube structure, geometry and operative characteristics so that color pure images will be realized in the operating tube.

A refractive medium may be used in the screen forming process to compensate for what has heretofore been classified as misregistry caused by the motion of the apparent center of deflection ofan electron beam as de-. scribed and claimed in copending application entitled Cathode Ray Tube Structure and Process," Glen A. Burdick, Serial No. 595,144, filed July 2, 1956, and assigned to the same assignee as the present invention. The misregistry error caused by the motion of the apparent center of deflection .is .radial with respect to the tube axis. However, in cathode ray tubes such as those illustrated in Figs. 3, 4 and 5, the error is most noticeable in the direction perpendicular to the direction of the stripes. For reasons of simplicity, this occurrence will be described in Figs; 8 through 10 inclusive with one electron gun and one set of phosphor dots of a tri-gun aperture mask type tube such as the one illustrated inFig. 2. Referring to Fig. 8, an electron beam is projected-towards screen 117 along axisX until it reaches the deflection field created by yoke coils 119,-at which time it is caused to follow the paraxial pathfrom point 0 to point G at the screen. ;Wider-or?extraaxial:detlection angles are also. shown at points H and I on the-screen;

Projecting back from these points through the corresponding mask holes, it can be seen that thebeam appears to come from points g, h and respectively rather than from point 0. This diagram exemplifies the apparent motion of the center of deflection for several deflection angles of one beam employed in the picture tube. It will be observed that the electron beam appears to emerge from the deflection region at a point successively closer to the screen for succesively larger deflection angles. All of the points between point and point j defines a line which is the locus of motion of the apparent center of deflection.

The process for forming the phosphor screen described heretofore employs a light source which radiates from a given stationary position which is known as the color center. It can be seen from Fig. 9 that misregistry will occur between the impinging electron beam 120 and the phosphorconfigura-tions 121 unless the color center can be made to move in accordance with the center of deflection during the screen forming process. An optimum position of the deflection coils 123 on the neck of the tube will result in radial misregistry occurring as indicated by the graph in Fig. 9(a). It will be observed that registry between the electron beam and the fluorescent dot in this instance occurs at the center point of the screen and at approximately 4 of its radius. Fig. 9( b) illustrates the appearance of the misregistry at several of the large number of positions of the screen. Referring to Fig. 9(a), the phosphor dots 121 were formed on panel 125 by an exposure operation from point K whereas the electron beam 120 appears to come from points L and M. The resulting misregistry is indicated by the arrows in the drawing.

It is to be understood that the graph shown in Fig.

9(c) is for only one position of the deflection coils 123 along the neck of the tube. Although the curve will remain substantially constant in form, it will move above or below the abscissa as the coils are moved forward 01( backward respectively of the position shown in Fig. 9 a).

In order to match the end points of the light rays employed in the exposure operation with the landing points of the electrons, a refractive medium or lens such as the symmetrical plane-concave spectacle crown glass lens 126 illustrated in Fig. 10 is used. During the screen forming operation, this lens is positioned on top of the light source structure and intermediate the source and the screen as indicatedin Fig. 7 by the numeral 87. Since the'locus of motion of the apparent center of deflection in the operating tube moves forward with an increase in deflection angle, the apparent origin of the light source is caused to follow a locus inthe same manner. The light transmitter 127 radiates a beam 129 which, if it were not refracted by the lens 126, would strike the screen 130 at point R. However, the electron beam for the same deflection angle appears to come from point P and strike the screen at point Q on the phosphor dot 131. Accordingly, the light beam 129 is refracted by lens 126 to effectively superpose the light beam 129 on the electron beam so that it also appears to come from point P. In this manner, the radial misregistry between the fluorescent configurations and the electron beam heretofore encountered is automatically corrected during the screen forming process.

The use of the exposure device or lighthouse shown in Fig. 7 enables superimposition in space of the locus of motion of the apparent light origin upon the locus of motion of apparent center of deflection during the exposure operation, with the photo-sensitive screen surface being the reference point in both instances. In Fig. 10, line N-P has the same magnitude and position relative to the face panel as line O-I shown in Fig. 8. Point N designates the paraxial light ray intercept position and point P designates one of the extra-axial intereept positions. '.A convenient method of defining the magnitude of locus N-P for any given deflection angle is in terms of optical aberration. An optical system comprising lens 126 and light source 127 may be con structed so as to have an optical aberration equivalent to the length of the locus of motion of the apparent center of deflection for all deflection angles. This optical aberration may be defined in terms of a unit of length, e.g., millimeters, which is measured along a reference axis between the intercept position of the paraxial light rays and the position of the extra-axial light rays. Optical aberration is referred to as being spherical when it is caused by the spherical form of the lens.

Although a plane-concave lens has been illustrated, it is to be understood that a planar lens with the proper thickness and index of refraction can be used in addition to more complicated lens surface configurations. The plane-concave lens shown is a preferred form because it is inherently easy to fabricate to high accuracy, can be readily located and held in accurate relationship to the light source and provides a relatively large motion (spherical aberration) for its size. The lens shown in Fig. 10 will give a satisfactory match with the electron optics produced by deflection yokes now employed with a spherical-faced 21 inch shadow mask type screen if it is positioned approximately 1% inches from the light source, has a center cross section thickness of approximately 4.5 millimeters, and has a concave surface radius of approximately 23 /2 centimeters. Under these conditions, the lens is positioned approximately 13.7 inches from th grid or mask of the tube.

Another factor eflecting registry between the electron beam and fluorescent configuration in a color picture tube is introduced by the earths magnetic field. It is well known that for any geographical location of the earths surface, the vertical component of the earths field varies in magnitude. However, the vertical component of the earths field diflieres verylittle for the most populated areas in the Northern Hemisphere. Consequently, any misregistry caused by this magnetic field component can be substantially compensated for in the majority of television receivers produced. It should be noted that the force exerted by the horizontal component of the earths field cannot be compensated for internally within the tube because it is diiferent for each position of rotation at any given geographical location.

Referring to Fig. 11, the force exerted by the vertical component of the earths field causes electron stream 133 to be continuously bent as it progresses from the region of the deflection coils 135 to the face panel 137. While bending also occurs in the neck region of the tube be tween the electron gun and the deflection coils, the effect is of relatively small significance. Several deflection angles have been shown to illustrate the equivalent effects of this force on the beam over the entire horizontal scan area.

The effects of this field on an electron beam' may be best understood by observing the type of misregistry it causes if no steps are undertaken to compensate for it. Fig. 12 shows several phosphor dots 139 arranged horizontally across the central portion of picture tube face panel 137. The vertical component of the earths field exerts a force on electron beams 133 to cause them to impinge upon the screen off-center of the dots 139. This type of misregistry is commonly referred to as transverse misregistry.

Although the screen shown in Fig. 12 is again exemplifying one gun of a shadow mask tube structure, it is equally applicable'to other types of tubes, particularly those employing vertically disposed phosphor stripes or bars. The magnitude of misrcgistry is shown to be existing only within a particular phosphor dot area, how. ever, the actual amount is much larger without the aid of magnetic shields. However, although shielding re duces the effects of the field, it is a costly structural item and it does not completely compensate for these field effects. Fig. 13 is a vector diagram illustrating the direction of force exerted on the electron beam due to the influence of the vertical component of the earths field.

Referring to Fig. 14, a single beam is shown for simplicity of analysis of the beam trajectory resulting from the influence of the vertical component of the earths field. The electron stream 143 is shown deflected over several different angles to strike the screen 145 at points S; T and U. Projecting backwardly from these points, it appears that the locus of the apparent center of deflection is a line 147 extending at an angle and ofl'set laterally from the locus 141 which was described more fully in connection with Fig. 8. It can be seen that the force exerted by the vertical component of the earths magnetic field is therefore transverse across the screen, and that it moves the apparent center of deflection toward the right side of those tubes operated in the Northern Hemisphere.

During the picture tube screen forming process, the lens has been previously described as being placed along the axis of the imaginary electron gun. In order to compensate for the variance in direction of travel of the electron beam during tube operation due to the average vertical component of theearths field, the lens is appropriately moved to a position whereat its locus of motion of light ray origin axis coincides with the locus of motion of the apparent center of deflection of the electron beam. Referring to Fig. 15, it can be seen that if-the light rod 152 is offset laterally a distance Y and tilted at an angle alpha (or) from the undeflected axis 153 ofthe electron beam 155, the light ray 159 will be refracted by lens 151 so that it will strike the screen 160 at the same point as the electron beam 155 strikes dot 1 61. The light ray 159 appears to come from a point on the apparent light source locus V, which point duplicates a point on the apparent electron beam locus v, after it' has been offset and moved with the locus to its tilted position; Although the amount of tilt and oflset needed in the optical system will be dependent upon the amount of shielding employed with the tube, an order of magnitude can be cited as an example. The tilt angle alpha (a) may be from 2 to 5 while the average offset Y may be from A; to A inch when using a symmetrical lens of the type heretofore described.

-A lens system of the type shown in Fig. 15 can be employed with a screen photo-printing operation such as the one described in connection with Fig. 7 to automatically compensate for variances in direction of electron travel due to the apparent motion of the center of deflection as heretofore described, and to the action of the vertical component of the earths magnetic field on the beam.

Color tubes which use a printing technique to form the fluorescent configuration pattern on the screen usually oflset the face panel axis or light transmitter axis relative to one another for each exposure operation in order to produce the separate color emitting phosphor patterns. In doing so, one portion of the screen is inherently closer to the light transmitter or point source of light for any given exposure and will therefore receive more light energy per unit area. Since the amount of light and the exposure time determines the hardening action of the sensitized polyvinyl alcohol used in the operation, better adherence uniformity between the glass face panel and phosphor materials may be acquired by tilting the light rod so that its axis lies in the direction of the normally underexposed area. Effectively, this insures better unifonmity of dot size near the edges of the screen by making the brightness of the apparent light source more nearly the same for all sections of the screen equi-distant from screen center.

Fig. 16 illustrates a'further application of this principle by adapting it to the optical system shown in Fig. 15. Here, the axis of lens 151 is tilted from the electron gun axis an angle alpha (or) while the axis of light rod 152 is tilted an angle rho (p) from the lens axis. Since attenuation of-light emanating from source 152 increases as the distance from the lens axis increases, and since the light output of source 152 decreases with an increase in distance from its tip, tilting the light axis to the opposite direction in the manner shown in Fig. 16 gives improved light distribution over the entire screen. The angle rho (p) may be approximately equal and opposite to the angle of tilt between the lens axis and gun axis. However, this angle is dependent upon the lens composition and size.

A still further application of an optical system to electron tube processing is realized with the provision of means for compensating for misregistry between the electron beam and the phosphor material configurations caused by dynamic convergence effects in a multi-gun type color picture tube.

It is well known that dynamic convergence is needed to maintain the cross-over point of the electron beams at the mask or grid of a multi-gun picture tube. Referring to Fig. 17, if dynamic convergence is not used, the electron beams will intersect at positions within the tube other than at the mask or grid position. Two electron beams 163 and 165 are shown converging at the one position n along the axis of the tube, but they intersect at positions m and q as the deflection angles are increased. In most instances, the electron gun emitters are mechanically positioned to correctly converge at the static convergence point n in the tube as illustrated in Fig. 17. Accordingly, dynamic convergence assemblies must be employed in conjunction with the deflection coils used with the tube so that the inter-beam distances can be regulated in the yoke or deflection area to effectively cause the beams to intersect at the surface of the grid or mask 167 for all deflection angles. It is apparent from Fig. 17 that the electron beams 163 and 165 must be moved further apart in the deflection region for larger deflection angles to achieve proper convergence. This is what the dynamic convergence magnets do to the beams in the operating tube and receiver.

The manner in which dynamic convergence effects the locus of the apparent motion of the center of deflection is illustrated in Fig. 18. As the deflection angles of electron beams 171 and 173 are increased, these beams appear to come from positions progressively further away from the tube axis 175 when viewed from the phosphor dots 177 and 178 on face panel 176. The loci 179 and 181 of these moving points define lines which extend substantially at right angles from the undeflected beam axes 183 and 185 respectively.

Application of dynamic convergence to the electron beams cause misregistry between the beam and the phosphor dots used on the screen of the tube. The cross sectional diagram of Fig. 18 shows, for simplicity, two of the three electron beams used in a conventional shadow mask tube of the type illustrated in Fig. 2. In order to better understand the appearance of the misregistry with three electron guns, Fig. 18 also shows an enlarged group oftriads positioned in accordance with the various deflection angles illustrated. It can be seen that misregistry between the centers of the phosphor dots 177, 178 and and their respective electron beams 173, 171 and 182 (not otherwise shown) are radial in nature and increases as the defiection angle increases. This misregistry results from the action of the dynamic convergence m'ag'- nets used with the tube which force the beams farther apart in the deflection region, thereby causing themto be farther apart at the screen.

To understand more easily the relative direction of the locus of the apparent center of deflection, the vector diagram shown in Fig. 19 may be used.- Since the electron beams must be moved further away from one another as the deflection angle increases in order to maintain convergence at the grid of the tube, movement of the: locus .of-ithe apparent :centerofdeflection in accordance; with these efiects: will be .in :the vdirectionindicated by, lll16-;A,..Wl1lCb;;is at right angles to the axis;of.the electron-beam. In;- addition to this movement, .it was previously explained that the motion of the apparent centerof deflection of the beam-alsomovestoward the screen with. increased deflection. angles. asindicated by.

line-B. ThevectorC is. formed .by the resultant of these. motions as shown in the diagram. Accordingly,- thelocus of; the apparent center. of. deflection-,rwhen; considering dynamic.convergence'effects and :tubegeometry, will lie along line C.

Fig. 20 shows .the applicationof. this principle to, the picturetube. The two beams 183 and 185 proceed to- ."ard .face;pane1.'1761 to intersectat grid 189. During static 1convergence conditions, the beam axes lie along line B;.. When. dynamic. convergence is ;appliedv and .as the deflection angles increase, the center of deflection. appears to move alcng line A, thereby providing a .resultant vector C deflningailocus of points from-which the electron: beams 183 and 185 appear to come from .whenviewed from face panel 176. In order to place fluorescent material configurations on the face panel 176 so that the electron beams will. striketheir centers, the locusof .the light source: used in, the screenformingprocess is made toconform to vector C..

Rer'erringto Fig. 21, the locusofthe apparent motion of the center of deflection for oneelectron-beam 191 is indicatedbythe line 193. The plano-concave lens 195 which is similar to the lens 87 in Fig.7, is ,used during the screen forming exposure operation to cause light rays 297. radiating fromlight transmitter. 199 to be. refracted and-cause the fluorescent material dots 2b1-to be formed on face panel 203 at the exact position where the elec- I tron beam will strike. As previously explained, the formation of other phosphor configurations suchas dot 205, which has different colorfluorescent characteristics than dot-.201, ,will be formedbyofisetting ,or positioning light rod. 199. andlens 195.so that their axis will lie along locus 5207. It can be. seen from Fig. 21, therefore, that in order to account for variations of the eletron. beam trajectories clue to dynamic convergence effects, the light optical system used to form the picture tube screen patterns are tilted an angle beta ([3) with respect to the axis.

209 of the electron gun. Due to the position of lens 195, .relative .to the electron gun axis 209, this. lens is eflectively oflset therefrom adistance Z, which may be approximately inch and tilted an angle .beta (5), approximately when using a lens ofthe type heretofore described- The optical system above describedhasbeen exempli tied in part with two electron beams of the three shown anddescribed in Fig. 2 as the shadow mask type tube for the purpose of simplicity. However, it is applicable to .all types of picture tubes employing multiple electron beams. If desired, light transmitter 199 may be tilted from thelens axis towards beam axis 191 to provide substantially constant light attenuation ,over the screen in accordance with the arrangement shown inFig; 16.

.Fig; 22 illustratesthe manner in which theoptical sy's: ternszheretofore described may be combined and used toproduce screens for color picture tubes which will have the fluorescent materialconfigurationsformed and positioned. on the face panel sothat they will register with the-impinging electron beam orbeamsemployed inv the tube. For convenience of illustration, two static position;.electron beam axes211and 213 are; shown inter: sectingatgrid: or. mask 215 and crossing one. another to intercept the fluorescent screen material 217 formed onstface-panel2l9rat adjoining positions. These .positionswill ordinarily be covered with difierent coloremitting;.phosphor:materials as previously explained.v The axe's21'1and 213 areshown to lie at the static convergence anglephiv 17) from the longitudinal axis of the tube.

The plano concave lens 221issimilar to lens-'87 shown with the screen forming exposure apparatus in Fig, 7,v

' and to the uis of 1panel'73.

In order to compensate for the apparent motion of the center ofdeflection toward the'screen for increasing deflection anglesasillustrated by Figs. 8 through 10 inelusive, the lens 221 is employed. This drawing shows one optical system including lens 221 arranged at the two positions which will produce the color emitting phosphor configurations dictated by the two electron beams shown.

Referring first to the optical system position relating to beam 213, the light transmitter 223 is oltset a distance Y parallel to the axis of beam 213, while the lens 221 and light rod 223 are tilted from axis 213 by an angle alpha (a) to form line 225. This offset and angle devia: tion compensates for the forces exerted by the vertical component of the earths magnetic field as illustrated in Figs. 11 to 15 inclusive. An angle beta ([3) is added to line 225 so that the axis 227 of lens 221 will be defined toaccount for the effects of dynamic convergence as explained in conjunction with Figs. 17 to 21 inclusive. The axis light rod 223 is tilted at an angle rho sub one (m),. from axis 227 to provide for substantially equal attenuation of light over the entire screen surface as explained in conjunction with Fig. 16.

When forming the fluorescent configurations in accordance with beam 211,- the optical system is moved to its successive position as indicatedon the right side of Fig. 22. Here again, the optical system is offset a dis:

tance Y and tilted at .an angle alpha (or) in the samemanner as has been previously described to define line 229, since the vertical components of the earths field is in the same transverse direction and at substantially the same magnitude for each of the beams employed .in

the tube. The axis 231 of lens 221 is then located an angle beta (5) away from line 229 to provide compensation for the efiects of dynamic convergence. Since;the: locus of the apparent motion for the center of deflection in this instance is a dilferent direction for each beamas shown in Fig. 20, this anglebeta (ii) must be subracted from anglealpha (a) to afford the correct total compensation for this beam. The axis of light rod 223 is then rotated from lens axis 231 an angle rho sub 2 (p to. provide the proper light attenuation over the entire screen area.

Viewing screens for color picture tubes constructed with the above described optical system and in accordane with the illustrated methods make possible the fabrication of screens capable of reproducing images having; color purity characteristics not heretofore attainable.v

Although several embodiments of the invention have been shown and described, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various changes and modifications may be made therein without departing from the scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.

What is claimed is:

1. An exposure device for forming apattern on'a light sensitive material coated viewing panel of:a cathoderay tube in accordance with those portions of the panel which are impinged upon by the electron stream employed in the-tube comprising a light transmitter formed to radiate light rays spaced from the panel, a grid structure in the tube comprising a light transmitter formed to radiate light rays spaced from the panel, a grid structure axially aligned with said panel, and a symmetrical planoconcave optical lens having an optical axis tilted from the axis of said panel interposed between said transmitter and said grid for retracting the light rays during exposure of said panel, the ElXiSOf said transmitter being tilted from the axis of said lens opposite to the tilt of the lens axis from the panel axis.

3. An exposure device for forming a pattern on a light sensitive material coated viewing panel of a cathode ray tube in accordance With those portions of the panel which are impinged upon by the electron stream employed in the tube comprising a light transmitter formed to radiate light rays spaced from the panel, a gridstructure axially aligned with said panel, and an optical lens having an optical axis tilted from the axis of said panel interposed between and spaced from said transmitter and said grid for retracting the light rays during exposure of said panel, the axis of said transmitter being tilted from the axis of said lens opposite to the tilt of the lens axis from the panel axis, the space dimension between said transmitter and said lens being smaller than between said lens and said grid.

4. An exposure device adapted to be used in the fabrication of cathode ray tubes having a longitudinal axis and of the type utilizing an electron gun formed to provide an electron beam which is deflected from a static path to scan a transversely disposed screen panel provided with light emissive material, the electron beam having a locus of motion of the apparent center of deflection, said device comprising a grid negative, means for spatially supporting said panel relative to one side of said grid and in alignment therewith, an optical system disposed on the opposite side of said grid and spaced therefrom comprising a point light source having an axis tilted from said longitudinal axis and a lens located between said light source and grid having an axis tilted opposite to the light source axis tilt, said lens providing a given locus of motion of apparent light ray origin, and means for supporting said optical system to substantially space position the locus of motion of apparent light ray origin on the locus of motion of apparent center of deflection.

References Cited in the file of this patent UNITED STATES PATENTS 1,245,606 MacCurdy Nov. 6, 1917 2,446,915 Filmer Aug. 10, 1948 2,548,565 Staehle Apr. 10, 1951 2,601,196 Willis June 17, 1952 2,625,734 Law Jan. 20, 1953 2,733,366 Grimm et al. Jan. 31, 1956 2,817,276 Epstein et al. Dec. 24, 1957 OTHER REFERENCES R. B. Janes et al.: Recent Improvements in the 21 AXP 22 Color Kinescope, June 1956 (reprinted from RCA Review, vol. XVH, No. 2) pages 1-167, publication No. ST-1019, RCA, Lancaster, Pa. 

